Mark Kirk Votes Against Feeding Children But Won't Try the Foodstamp Challenge
Today, Mark Kirk voted against the Farm, Nutrition, and Bioenergy Act Conference Report. I bet I know why too: Two-thirds of the money in the farm bill would go to public nutrition programs like food stamps. Mark always hated feeding children. Last time the issue of food stamps was visited he called it pork. He never took the Food Stamp Challenge like Jan Schakowsky did. She mentioned that again last Friday at the Women's Power Lunch. She said it was pretty hard to eat on the $3/day.
It's never too late Mark. How about taking the Food Stamp Challenge and find out what sort of life you are giving to poor children in this country, many of them in your own district. Here's a little description of what you might find:
Here is Ohio Rep. Tim Ryan's account of his experience with the Food Stamp Challenge. His weekly budget bought:
One bag of corn meal- $1.43
Two jars of strawberry preserves- $4.00
One jar of chunky peanut butter- $2.48
Two boxes of angel hair pasta- $1.54
One can of coffee- $2.50
Three jars of tomato sauce- $4.50
Two cartons of cottage cheese- $3.00
One loaf of wheat bread- $.89
One clove of garlic- $.32
That's food for a week and it was last year's prices. I can only imagine how little he could get for less than $21 now and what about the gas for the car to go to the store. My little car filled up at almost $45 yesterday.
The bill passed and Bush has vowed to veto it because he hates kids too. I imagine he spent way more than the Food Stamp Challenge daily amount per person on the toothpicks for Jenna's wedding dinner. As Kirk voted against the conference report, he's unlikely to vote to override Bush's veto. McCain is against the bill as well and probably spends way more than the daily food stamp allotment from his wife Cindy's fortune for on his pre-bedtime milk and cookies. Cindy only today divesting her Sudan holdings.
What cowards, McCain, Kirk and Bush. They wouldn't last an hour on what they force American children to live on every day.
I'm not saying the Farm Bill is perfect, but I agree with the Detriot Free Press that favored the bill despite its flaws because at some point as we sink beyond the recession McCain and Kirk still deny exists into a very real possibility of a depression, we have to feed people. Kirk's vote today is a good indication of what he'll do if the worst happens, we'll get Herbert Hoover when we need FDR.
It's never too late Mark. How about taking the Food Stamp Challenge and find out what sort of life you are giving to poor children in this country, many of them in your own district. Here's a little description of what you might find:
I survived the entire week drinking water almost exclusively, which brings me to my second issue. It became very clear to me that to eat a diet entirely funded through the Food Stamp Program, one had to consume fairly unhealthy food and drinks. I could not afford orange juice, thus did not get my daily recommended allowance of vitamin C. I could not drink milk, thus did not get sufficient amounts of calcium. I ate almost no fresh fruit or vegetables. The Ramen noodles I ate for lunch had very high sodium content. The only meats I could afford had a high fat content. The bread I used was not multigrain and therefore had a low fiber content. Much of my dinner each night consisted of simple carbohydrates which quickly turn to sugar in the body. Because of this I cheated and continued to take multivitamins which I had purchased prior to the FS Challenge.
Here is Ohio Rep. Tim Ryan's account of his experience with the Food Stamp Challenge. His weekly budget bought:
One bag of corn meal- $1.43
Two jars of strawberry preserves- $4.00
One jar of chunky peanut butter- $2.48
Two boxes of angel hair pasta- $1.54
One can of coffee- $2.50
Three jars of tomato sauce- $4.50
Two cartons of cottage cheese- $3.00
One loaf of wheat bread- $.89
One clove of garlic- $.32
That's food for a week and it was last year's prices. I can only imagine how little he could get for less than $21 now and what about the gas for the car to go to the store. My little car filled up at almost $45 yesterday.
The bill passed and Bush has vowed to veto it because he hates kids too. I imagine he spent way more than the Food Stamp Challenge daily amount per person on the toothpicks for Jenna's wedding dinner. As Kirk voted against the conference report, he's unlikely to vote to override Bush's veto. McCain is against the bill as well and probably spends way more than the daily food stamp allotment from his wife Cindy's fortune for on his pre-bedtime milk and cookies. Cindy only today divesting her Sudan holdings.
What cowards, McCain, Kirk and Bush. They wouldn't last an hour on what they force American children to live on every day.
I'm not saying the Farm Bill is perfect, but I agree with the Detriot Free Press that favored the bill despite its flaws because at some point as we sink beyond the recession McCain and Kirk still deny exists into a very real possibility of a depression, we have to feed people. Kirk's vote today is a good indication of what he'll do if the worst happens, we'll get Herbert Hoover when we need FDR.






9 Comments:
You are truly unhinged. Kirk didn't vote against the Farm Bill because he hates poor children, he voted against it because it is chock full of wasteful pork and corporate agribusiness giveaways. I would think that you would favor not giving free money to huge conglomerates but that would require you admitting that Kirk is right. And you just can't do that, can you?
By
Anonymous, at Thursday, May 15, 2008 12:04:00 AM
So, to make a point, he'll starve children. That was the point you missed. Why doesn't Kirk take the food stamp challenge? Are you worried he might miss his daily dosage of vitamin mean?
By
Ellen Beth, at Thursday, May 15, 2008 7:29:00 AM
Can anyone believe in this great Country children go hungry and the public knows it. It is so sad that our leaders condone it. We are supposed to set an example for the world. I don't think our forfathers would like to see what we have become during the Bush administration!
By
Anonymous, at Thursday, May 15, 2008 9:47:00 AM
I would think this would be an especially crucial issue right now as kids are getting out of school for the summer. I imagine that one way parents stretch those food stamp dollars is with the free breakfast/lunch programs, but with kids getting out of school, those won't exist for the summer which will put an additional strain on their already strained food budgets.
Thanks Rep. Kirk!
By
Little Merry Sunshine, at Thursday, May 15, 2008 10:10:00 AM
"Mark always hated feeding children."
You of course know this for a fact because you have talked to Mark Kirk personally about this and he has told you in no uncertain terms that he always hated feeding children?
Clearly such conversation never took place.
In this great country of ours people go hungry. No one is proud of that. But solutions to the problem need to be intelligently created AND intelligently funded.
The current rigid partisanship "gotcha" political climate in Congress will have to end in order for this to occur. But so far all I have really seen out of this Congress is repeated "gotcha!" "gotcha!" "gotcha!" Adding more "gotcha" types to Congress (by electing Dan Seals) will only exacerbate this nonsense. What is the purpose of such behavior? To further the lives of those living in the U.S. or to throw mudballs at your political opponents?
It must take guts to buck these types of "gotcha" bills. And it look likes Kirk has the guts to do it.
When I see some major initiative come out of this Democratic Party controlled Congress, I will stand up and applaud. What is coming out of Congress these days is just "gotcha" nonsense.
Louis G. Atsaves
By
Anonymous, at Thursday, May 15, 2008 1:31:00 PM
Kirk shows his beliefs in his actions and his actions are that he has always voted against feeding children. If you can come up with a vote that increased benefits for the hungry, do post it.
Kirk could hve make it up to them this week by voting for extending unemployment payments instead of participating in Boehner's political game on the war funding bills, but no. Kirk would rather make a political point than feed a kid whose parents are unemployed.
Kirk himself is well fed and could care less about those who are not. If he wanted to show he cared he could take the Foodstamp Challenge himself and I call on him to do so and report back on what he was able to purchase and how it felt to eat that way.
By
Ellen Beth, at Saturday, May 17, 2008 11:40:00 AM
Ah Ellen, still stuck on "gotcha" politics. That will solve none of the problems facing our nation. Name one bill Dan Seals supported before being called for a vote that called for "feeding children." Two can play that game. And a game it is. With children, mothers and others being used as pawns.
While you busy yourself with all those "gotcha" votes, pray tell us how many Democrats in Congress voted against the "gotcha" bills or voted present or voted not at all? Either a whole lot of moderates are sitting in Washington or a whole lot of Democrats are too afraid to walk the same plank you are trying to push everyone on.
Yet at the end of each vote, the Democratic leadership with the majority in each chamber of the legislative branch blames Republicans and not the Democrats that vote against the leadership proposals for the failure of those bills and resolutions. Such myopia is very unflattering.
The approval rating of Congress and the current Congressional leadership is lower than that of President George Bush. That lower approval rating is well earned and deserved. Perhaps the "gotcha" games being employed are the reasons for this?
When does the "Apple Pie" vote come up? Followed by all the Grandmothers who bake them? How sad for our nation when the Congressional leadership and the majority in Congress play these little childish schoolyard games right now.
It takes guts to vote against "gotcha" bills.
Louis G. Atsaves
By
Anonymous, at Sunday, May 18, 2008 1:29:00 AM
Mr. Atsaves, your comment is extremely disingenuous. A description of a long history of a congressman's voting record is not "gotcha" politics. It is how the man votes and how he is representing the district. What you should do is explain to all of us why Kirk's anti family and anti child votes are correct, or is that impossible for anyone to do without looking like a monster?
By
Anonymous, at Sunday, May 18, 2008 7:52:00 PM
Anon 7:52, your generalities do not further the debate. The issue is the actions of Congress now in pushing "gotcha" votes that solve nothing and are designed for childish campaign purposes.
When I see ALL Democrats voting for such bills, then I will see those "gotcha" bills pass. And then? Nothing. Maybe that is why so many Democrats refuse to follow their leadership. Some Democrats actually can think straight.
My favorite are those red signs that state: "Support the Troops. End The War."
No one disagrees with that. But then you Democrats refuse to state HOW you will end the war. Absent the HOW there is no debate, just mindless sloganeering.
I notice that all Democrats in leadership were upset that Bush made a comment about "appeasers." This after ripping on Bush as being a mindless war monger for the past few years. So it is OK to call Bush blood thirsty? Same thing, different spin.
Let's move away from the "gotcha" bills and the sloganeering and being debating. Is that so hard?
Apparently so!
Louis G. Atsaves
By
Anonymous, at Sunday, May 18, 2008 8:12:00 PM
Post a Comment
<< Home